Rollin Stanley's Letter to the Editor

March 7, 2012

Dear Mr. Hull:

In "Past Present and Future," (March/April 2010 Edition), my words left the impression that I do not respect those who disagree with my ideas.

It was not my intention to denigrate the opinions of any citizen or discourage anyone from participating in the debate over the future of Montgomery County, and I regret any pain or embarassment my words may have caused.

As a public official, I recognize that I have an obligation to listen to members of the public, even (and perhaps especially) those who have different views.

Part of what has made Montgomery County great is its long tradition of active engagement by highly dedicated and serious advocates on a wide range of issues, including land use and real estate development.

In view of this especially, I apologize for coming across as dismissive of critics of the Planning Department. I do believe that open public discourse is essential both to good decisions and to democratic accountability.

I intend to make every effort to be inclusive and welcoming of different perspectives as we work together to strengthen our community.


Rollin Stanley
Planning Director

Edit Module
Edit ModuleShow Tags

Archive »Related Articles

County Fire Department: Abuse of Sick Leave Has Decreased

Division chief says new policy guidelines have prevented abuse

UPDATED: Board of Elections President Wants to Restore One of Two Early Voting Sites

Republican Jim Shalleck says he’s proposing the move in ‘attempt to compromise’

A Delicious Alternative to an Apple Pie

How to make Apple Tarte Tatin

Human Trafficking in Montgomery County

Trafficking is happening here--in massage parlors, nice hotels, even a town house in Rockville
Edit Module Edit ModuleShow Tags Edit ModuleShow Tags Edit ModuleShow Tags Edit Module


Your Guides to Leading
Local Professionals

Edit ModuleShow Tags Edit ModuleShow Tags

Talk With Us

On Social Media


Edit ModuleShow Tags Edit Module


Edit ModuleShow Tags
Edit ModuleShow Tags